Moderator: Titanic-Titanic.com Moderator Team
fanofall wrote:it is a great point regarding the lack of lifeboats. It didnt matter in the end as there simply wasnt enough time.

fanofall wrote:I do believe though that had the crew and officers put more emphasis on getting the passengers on the boats straight away, then more would definitely have been saved.
peter stephen richard howcroft wrote:Hi Andrew
I was completely unaware of the info in your above thread.
what was the matter with people back in 1912?
They declare a ship unsinkable. Put enough lifeboats on it to save only half the folk on board, and put her to sea with a crew of whom only a handful were trained to lower a lifeboat.
I am completely bewildered by it all.
Christ no wonder Titanic sunk with the likes of such complacency & buffoonery
Clearly this story gets worse when I hear info like that.
1) so there was not enough lifeboats.
2) not enough crew to lower them,
I put it to you folk also that White-star continued to call there ships unsinkable has they did with the passengers aboard Britannic prior to her sinking.
Clearly none of White-stars liners were unsinkable and it was a daft godless publicity stunt to say they were and to continue to say they were while Titanic had been on the ocean floor for 6 years.
Titanic sank 1912.
Britannic sank 1918.
kind regards to all Peter Im both&
Re untrained crew.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests